Saturday, April 2, 2016

The Materiality of Sound — and the idiocy of the graduate student.

Nassau St. NY. 1926
Everyone knows that graduate students have plenty of time for their life, their passions, their relax, and their significant others. Because of this constant free time, I decided that I should not pay attention to the syllabus and I picked the readings for the 12th of April, instead of the ones for the 5th. Loyal to the spirit of the blog as a “reading” one, I decided that today I will write about the Sound, hoping to be heard.


The article of Mark M. Smith “Sound—So What?,” published on the November 2015 issue of The Public Historian[1] represent a manifesto of the importance of adding sound in our discipline. The scholar put his hear on the rail and explains how a new train of historians is coming at full speed. Smith discusses about recent books and articles on this argument demonstrating the possibilities offered by the new studies. These opportunities rarely offer groundbreaking discoveries on the past, but surely offer a more deep understanding of it.
One of the works analyzed by Smith is Emily Ann Thompson’s The Soundscape of Modernity[2], a book that was actually our assignment for the week (well not for this week…). A marvelous study on how the perception and handling of sound changed in the first third of the twentieth century, the book resounds too well with my personal interest in the history of technology.
Indeed, science and technology are of central importance in the book, because the concept of sound changed only when from an expression felt from the senses, it became a physical expression of the material world. Throughout her work, Thompson describes well this transformation: from the alchemic understanding of a society used to feel, but not describe empirically the sound, the discoveries in acoustic transformed sound in something that had understandable qualities; this step cleared the path for others, who used the modern instruments offered by the new electronical devices to understand the interaction of sound and object. But there is a very important aspect of the question that Thompson does not forget: people felt the sound, had ideas on it, interacted with the possibilities and the danger that it offered them: it is this kind of interaction that makes history. This connection changed the society and provoked the transformations of the world, from the noisy streets of the new metropolis to the pure beauty of the Symphony Halls.







[1] Mark M. Smith, “Sound—So What?,” The Public Historian 37:4 (November 2015): 132-44.

[2] Emily Ann Thompson, The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America, 1900-1933 (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2002).