Monday, February 8, 2016

C’mon Indiana, no gold this time.



Let’s start with the end: “It is terribly important that the ‘small thing forgotten’ be remembered. For in the seemingly little and insignificant things that accumulate to create a lifetime, the essence of our existence is captured.”[p. 259]
From the title of James Deetz’s book, In Small Things Forgotten, it would seem that the focus for good history — archeology to be precise — is the small objects that are dug up from the layers of the past. In one sense it is, both because an archeologist passes most of his time in the field sifting through the dirt to find any small piece of pottery or any other material that had been manipulated by man, and because throughout the book Deetz masterly immerses the reader in the fascinating and sometimes even touching world of the people that lived and experienced their lives around these objects.
Yet Deetz in analyzing these objects takes serious care to highlight patterns. Anything coming from the past has the dual nature of evidence and narrative. From the smoke pipe to the house, but in a bigger sense also events, writings, ideas and, as reported in the book, music, all constitute the language that a world long gone uses to talk about itself; as with words, objects possess a meaning by themselves, but together they don’t just describe to an acute observer what they were meant for and how they were used, but they paint a picture of the society around them, its culture and religion.
Deetz in almost a romantic way dwells in the cemeteries, were his dialogue with Shakespeare’s Yorik does not bring an existential question on the human life — a question on which, at least for compassion, any historian should indulge in sometimes — but a very interesting description on the stylistic changes of the decoration on the gravestones. Deetz handles the dangerous argument with the efficient toolbox of archeology, double-checking and cross-referencing, using statistics and analyzing the properties of the materials.
The patterns pop out clearly from the carefully assembled investigation. From the single objects, even the single fragment of pottery, comes out the whole image. Clearly the past is lost, it is a memory with blurred contours: something is lost forever, like the burned-down house were Cato Howe, a freed slave that fought in the Revolution, lived from 1792 until his death in 1823. Cato is now only a name, even his face is lost, yet this somewhat depressing thought is counterbalanced by the present: we, the present, are his heritage, and we can reconstruct the past thanks to his actions, such as the structure of the foundations of the house that he built, the legal documents that attest that the community granted him some land, and the meager list of things that he left behind after his departure.
Two lessons are clear from In Small Things Forgotten: the power of the connection of objects, its “Aura” —if we want to steal from Benjamin’s theories from the last week—, and the strength of evidence, which comes only from research and accumulation of data.
Nothing new perhaps, but reading such a pleasant work renews again the passion for the lost little things of the past for us little Indiana Jones: he was an archeologist too! The newspaper is perhaps not as “valuable” as the Sacred Grail, but I bet that Indiana thrived for the action, not for the money.

Deetz, James. In Small Things Forgotten: [an Archaeology of Early American Life]. Expanded and rev. ed. New York: Anchor Books, 1996.

“What a fitting end to your life's pursuits. You're about to become a permanent addition to this archaeological find. Who knows? In a thousand years, even you may be worth something.” – Raiders of the Lost Ark



Let's not dig in the wrong place though.

No comments:

Post a Comment